Friday, January 28, 2005

A Farewell of Sorts

Politically Correct. What does it mean?

It means that, before you speak ill of a group of people, you should put yourself in their shoes. It means you should take just a moment to bring them to a level equivalent to yourself in your mind's eye, and consider, in that moment of empathy, whether what you are about to say would be hurtful.

Many would think this moment of reflection would be a good thing, since it leads to being considerate of others and speaking with civility and respect, even to those with whom you disagree.

But to the purveyors of hate, such consideration is very bad thing. In their desperate insecurity, they strive to make themselves feel "better" by inventing a "lesser" other. If they fail at this act of invention, they might have to admit their own lack of superiority. Beware the wrath of the spiteful bigot who is asked to curb their cruel and bitter speech. Be prepared to become the next target. Be prepared for claims of intolerance and "political correctness" - as if intolerance of evil and consideration for others is bad.

I have, in the past, stood by while a bigot held forth on the inferiority of another class of people. I even laughed at some of the jokes, which were worded in a particularly entertaining way. I did not share the views, but could appreciate the wit in the joke. But then, a friend informed me of the deep hurt caused by a seemingly minor statement, and I came to realize the mistake I had made in failing to stand up and hold the bigot accountable.

This is why, today, I must say goodbye to some dear friends.

I have built some interesting friendships as part of a group of mostly wonderful individuals. The group has one member, however, whose bigotry is consistent, and intolerable. Several members feel that this hate speech is unacceptable, but others are willing to tolerate it as so-called "free speech." As a result, as of today, when it became clear that I would have to tolerate the bigotry as a condition of continued membership in the group, I chose to leave the group.

I cannot, in good conscience, continue to be part of a group that would require me to turn away and ignore this wrong. To do so would be to become complicit in the wrong.

I refuse to participate in what Claudia Koonz referred to as the "everyday brutality of the averted gaze."

I will miss my friends, but it would be a lie to say this is a hard decision. Given the choice between standing by and offering implicit support to hate or walking away, it's a no-brainer. I hope that someday my friends will come to recognize the harm that is being done, and will choose to stand against bigotry as well.

In the mean time, I must move on to the next adventure.

Click for more...

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

No Go on Gonzales

During the Abu Ghraib toruture hearings, Senator Joe Biden, whose son is a member of the US Armed forces, stated the point perfectly. We adhere to the Geneva Conventions to protect our soldiers.
"By allowing this, you have put my son at severe risk of torture."

The moment a country lowers itself to the level of torturer, that country has lost any claim to morality in their actions.

In proclaiming the Geneva Conventions "obsolete," Mr. Gonzales cut loose the dogs of destruction, freeing them to shred the moral code that once guided this nation in the crafting of those very Conventions. Mr. Gonzales has betrayed the trust of the American people. He has betrayed our constitution. He has betrayed morality itself.

No one who can condone such cruel, brutal, and vicious treatment of human beings deserves a role in which he could decide the fates of millions of Americans.

When the gulag in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba was created, Mr. Gonzalez approved of a new definition for people picked up by our troops or law enforcement agents: "unlawful combatant." In the past, such people were referred to as "prisoners" or "prisoners of war," depending on where they were apprehended. In attempting to subvert the constitution, by pretending that the invention of a new phrase for an old concept was a reasonable substitute for justice, Mr. Gonzales has demonstrated that he is not to be trusted to uphold the Constitution.

A man who will dehumanize others, is capable of dehumanizing anyone. We cannot allow such a person to hold the keys to justice in our country. As a matter of fact, this man should not be allowed to hold any office. He is a disgrace to decent Americans and shames us all.

Click for more...

Progressive Women's Blog Ring

Join | List | Prev | Next | Random | Prev 5 | Next 5 | Skip Prev | Skip Next

Powered by RingSurf